In an era of the “modern internet” defined by algorithmic feeds, surveillance advertising, and AI-generated “slop,” Wikipedia has just reached a milestone that many thought impossible. On January 15, 2026, the world’s most famous non-profit knowledge project officially turned 25, continuing to operate with zero ads and over 7 billion unique monthly visitors.

As it celebrates its silver jubilee, Wikipedia remains a rare relic of the original “Web 2.0” dream—a digital commons built by people, for people. Here is how Wikipedia has survived a quarter-century of digital transformation and why its greatest challenges may still lie ahead.

---

A Quarter-Century of “Human-Powered” Knowledge

Launched in 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, Wikipedia began as a radical experiment: Could a volunteer-driven, open-source platform become a reliable reference for the world?

Twenty-five years later, the numbers speak for themselves:

• 65 Million+ Articles: Available in over 300 languages.

• 7 Billion Monthly Visitors: Nearly matching the entire human population in unique reach.

• 250,000 Active Volunteers: A global army of editors who fact-check, update, and debate every sentence.

• Non-Profit Legacy: Operated by the Wikimedia Foundation and funded by roughly 8 million individual donors.

The “Zero Ads” Philosophy: Why Independence Matters

Unlike social media giants that monetize user attention through intrusive tracking and targeted ads, Wikipedia has famously refused to sell its screen real estate. This “zero ads” policy is more than just a user-friendly feature; it is the foundation of its editorial independence.

By relying on small donations rather than corporate sponsors, Wikipedia avoids the pressure to “clickbait” or prioritize engagement over accuracy. This has earned it the title of one of the “last bastions of the early internet,” where the goal is information, not profit.

Wikipedia vs. The Age of AI

As Wikipedia enters its 26th year, it faces a new landscape dominated by Generative AI. While human readership has seen a slight decline (down approximately 8% as users turn to chatbots for quick answers), Wikipedia’s role has become even more critical.

1. Training the Machines

AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are largely trained on Wikipedia’s vast, human-curated data. Recently, the Wikimedia Foundation signed licensing deals with tech giants like Microsoft, Meta, and Perplexity to provide high-speed, structured access to its content. Founder Jimmy Wales has noted that while he welcomes AI training on “human-curated” data, these billion-dollar companies must “pay their fair share” to support the infrastructure they rely on.

2. The Battle Against “AI Slop”

Editors are currently on high alert for “AI slop”—unverified or hallucinated content generated by bots and posted to the site. Wikipedia’s commitment to human-powered verification is now the primary defense against the dilution of online truth.

Facing Political and Legal Pressures

The 25th anniversary comes at a time of increasing external pressure. From the UK’s Online Safety Act to political attacks labeling the site “Wokepedia,” the platform is constantly navigating threats of government repression and censorship. High-profile critics, including Elon Musk (who launched the rival “Grokipedia”), have challenged its neutrality, yet Wikipedia’s community-governance model remains resilient.

How to Support the Future of Free Knowledge

Wikipedia’s “impossible dream” persists because of its users. As it looks toward the next 25 years, the platform remains focused on:

• Incentivizing new editors: Combating “editor burnout” to ensure a diverse range of voices.

• Maintaining Neutrality: Refining the “Neutral Point of View” (NPOV) policy in a polarized world.

• Sustainable Funding: Transitioning from “donation banners” to stable enterprise licensing for AI companies.

Conclusion: At 25, Wikipedia is more than just a website; it is a global infrastructure. In a world increasingly cluttered with generated noise, the “old friend” we often take for granted remains the most reliable map of human knowledge we have.